The Independent are continuing, in this case once more through Johann Hari, to prove themselves unusual in the UK print media. Hari’s article is a needed one; there were, indeed, five years of slightly shoddy, British-Rail-sandwich Labourism before Blair got handed an excuse for a crusade and the rest of his party leapt caroling into the shark pool. The bit of ‘real Labour’ legislation I tend to cite is the New Deal, which although it had problems, did achieve real effects. Yes, it put my friend for seven months into the power of a psychotic barrow-boy who attacked him with a chair during a tantrum. On the other hand, my friend got seven months in work after two years out and has re-built his life successfully since then. Score one for socialist politics.

There is an argument that says the main difference between left and right wing is that the left believes scoring one success matters.

The gap between Labour and the Conservatives is far too small, but a lot of people live and die in that gap. If you say this difference doesn’t matter, you are saying all these people whose lives have been changed since the sun rose over the Royal Festival Hall that morning in May don’t matter to you. You are saying to the call-centre worker paid five times more because of the minimum wage, the gay couple getting a civil partnership, or the old woman who doesn’t have to wait two years to be able to walk again – that difference in your life isn’t worth a cross in a box to me. Wouldn’t that be a betrayal as ugly as New Labour’s? Don’t these people – the beneficiaries of what we all did on May 1st 1997 – deserve more than a defeated and dejected sigh to protect them from the Tories?

*        *        *

Laurie Penny is usually at her best when impassioned and also right. Many of us are. This post is an excellent example; her injucntion to vote to avoid your children growing up through the kind of schools I did, and the kind of hospitals I did, is well received. But there’s another aspect to the reason one should vote that isn’t in the post. It’s a fucking privilege.

Until this election, when asked the most significant domestic political event of my lifetime I would say “Ghana 1992”. I had lived in a military dictatorship all my life. I could remember Ak-47s from the muzzle end by the time I was five. The economy was fucked (mostly due to corruption and stupid policies in the 1970s, partly due to four years of harvest failure). “They” tried to kill the guy in charge 17 times before I hit ten years old, but he was still there. And in 1992, a decade after promising to fix the economy and then hold free elections, he actually did it. Even the BBC thought so. The country certainly did. The referendum on the 4th Republic passed with over 80% of the vote. Rawlings was re-elected in 1996; they wanted to change the constitution so he could stand a third time but he refused, stepped down, and left the world stage.

The children I grew up with had never hoped for control of their government but they got it. The social and political atmosphere in the villages and on the football fields of northern Ghana was unlike anything I’ve ever seen. Jerry Rawlings, the Big Man, JJ himself had got his wealthy ass and his trademark sunglasses into a Land Rover for seven months. He’d driven it round the northern villages, standing in the sun and talking to chiefs and women and people in the markets. By day twelve, his message was simple. Elect me; I’ll fix the damn roads, they’re dreadful, why did none of us know? Because we stayed in the south where the money is. All of my opponents are still there. Elect me; I will build the roads that can bring that money north.

And he did fix the roads, too. And built a telephony system that kinda works. And got the power grid out into the countryside, and …

Because of the greater geo-political and economic significance of the United Kingdom, its slow lurch towards democracy must supercede my smaller and earlier experiences. But I would like to say this to those who have watched and read and talked and still don’t think they’ll bother. We in the West look down on the illiterate, because we have a culture whose success is based on literature. We look down on those who farm their own food on their own land as ‘subsistence’ farmers. But in that illiterate, hard-working, simple tribal village, there wasn’t anyone over 16 who didn’t see the chance to elect the government without getting beaten up as a gift from heaven to every free soul in their nation. No-one failed to be enthused; no-one stayed at home. At church, the people drummed and danced, and held up their ink-stained thumbs and chanted thanks to God for new freedoms. The pastor wasn’t even there, they were just encouraging those still queuing to vote.

Please, vote! Please help me believe that the peoples of the oldest modern state can still see beyond their complacence and become full citizens again.

Please: vote.



Filed under Content, Signal

7 responses to “Right

  1. Thankyou for this post – the second half in particular is powerful and thought-provoking. The comparison between literacy and turn-out is compelling. I’m also fascinated by the history of a nation that re-elected their own military dictator. Has Ghana maintained that high voting turn-out, since?

    • johnqpublican

      It’s gotten a bit complicated lately. Turnout there is still relatively high compared to Britain.

      The thing with Rawlings is he promised 10 years of deprivation and hardship after which the economy would function and people would be able to see it in their daily lives. He then delivered on that promise; a salutory lesson for Western politicians.

      We’re just starting to see the problems of democracies; oil-based corruption, government scandals involving British companies and so on. But we’re also seeing a Justice ministry who’re trying to prosecute [1], a national press community who will print retractions if proved wrong, and an electorate who remember being granted the vote personally.

      We’re also talking about Kwame’s country. Nkrumah invented the modern doctrine of Unite Afrika, founded the OAU, and was the first African leader to win independence from colonial Britain. In him Ghanaians have an exemplar of democratic values and civil liberties who mirrors Dr. King for Afro-Americans.

      There’s hope.

      [1] See Craig Murray’s ‘Ghana’ tag for more details on the Zakhem power-company fraud and Jack Straw’s personal involvement. Private Eye noticed as well.

      • johnqpublican

        Just noticed that it’s worth qualifying this statement about Nkrumah. He wrote an exemplar of democratic values and civil liberties. What he actually did when in power was, well, really not that. But he and the rest of the Big Six did leave a philosophical heritage of values and practical organisations (including the University at Legon) which have stood Ghana in very good stead so far.

  2. “You are saying to the call-centre worker paid five times more because of the minimum wage …”

    Ok, I’m voting Liberal because they abolished slavery in 1833.

    Just because Labour brought in the minimum wage doesn’t mean that I’m obligated to them forever, nor does it mean that they are anything other than dangerous now – think torture, 42 day detention, nibbling away at jury trial &c &c

    • johnqpublican

      I may have misfired here. I quoted Johann Hari on what we lose alongside the Labour Party, but certainly not to suggest that one should vote for them this election. For more or less exactly the reasons you list here.

      However, we are losing the Labour party, the one that actually backed the policies which would benefit the 80% of people who don’t own their own business or house. It was the remaining moral force of that tradition which pushed Blair to the centre-left those first five years; it is that force in British politics that both Johann and I would mourn if it disappears under the weight of the spin-doctors.

      New Labour hasn’t acted much like one, but an actual labour party would be a good thing.

  3. I take your point – think I’m getting a bit jumpy!

    • johnqpublican

      One of the things people have been talking about in the clattering classes is the effect of PR on broad-church parties. They have less reason to stay together as parties, and there is a strong chance that both the Tories and Labour would split, possibly even the Liberals from the Democrats.

      An alternative might well be to unite the LibDems with the union wing of the Labour party, creating a broad-church national party which was led by liberal principles, was strong on civil liberties and economics, was evidence-basd and scientifically competent, and represented the interests of the commonalty. This could not be anything but a very good thing.